New terrorist methods threats the dutch multicilturalism model!!
The head of the French intelligence agency (Renseignements généraux - RG) denied any Islamic factor in the riots, while the New York Times reported on November 5, 2005 that "while a majority of the youths committing the acts are Muslim, and of African or North African origin" local residents say that "second-generation Portuguese immigrants and even some children of native French have taken part."
Police made two arrests Sunday morning, 13 November 2005, in Waalwijk in the southern province of North Brabant, after four cars were burned during Saturday night disturbances.
More than a dozen cars were firebombed and several others damaged in incidents in the Dutch port of Rotterdam on the night of Saturday, 12 November 2005.[95]
"... All of this doesn't appear to us to be completely spontaneous," [107], while Paris conservative prosecutor Yves Bot told on November 3 to Europe 1 radio that "This is done in a way that gives every appearance of being coordinated." French national police spokesman, Patrick Hamon, was quoted in the Wall Street Journal as saying that there appeared to be no coordination among gangs in different areas. But he said youths in individual neighborhoods were communicating by cellphone text messages, online blogs, and/or email — arranging meetings and alerting one another other about possible police operations. This conspiracy theory was afterward denied by the head of the Renseignements Généraux (RG) itself, the French intelligence agency, on November 23 [108].
The controversial Union of Islamic Organisations of France (UOIF) issued a fatwa against the riots, without much result. Dalil Boubakeur, mufti of Paris' Great Mosque and leader of the French Council of Musulman Faith (CFCM), as well as Marseilles's mufti, criticized the UOIF for this irrelevant fatwa and opposed Nicolas Sarkozy's controversial use of Islamic organizations, declaring that their role was not to intercede for the youth. Henceforth, the leading authorities of French Islamic organizations refused any political deviation of Islam, which was to be maintained in the private sphere as a personal matter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_Paris_suburb_riots
Police made two arrests Sunday morning, 13 November 2005, in Waalwijk in the southern province of North Brabant, after four cars were burned during Saturday night disturbances.
More than a dozen cars were firebombed and several others damaged in incidents in the Dutch port of Rotterdam on the night of Saturday, 12 November 2005.[95]
"... All of this doesn't appear to us to be completely spontaneous," [107], while Paris conservative prosecutor Yves Bot told on November 3 to Europe 1 radio that "This is done in a way that gives every appearance of being coordinated." French national police spokesman, Patrick Hamon, was quoted in the Wall Street Journal as saying that there appeared to be no coordination among gangs in different areas. But he said youths in individual neighborhoods were communicating by cellphone text messages, online blogs, and/or email — arranging meetings and alerting one another other about possible police operations. This conspiracy theory was afterward denied by the head of the Renseignements Généraux (RG) itself, the French intelligence agency, on November 23 [108].
The controversial Union of Islamic Organisations of France (UOIF) issued a fatwa against the riots, without much result. Dalil Boubakeur, mufti of Paris' Great Mosque and leader of the French Council of Musulman Faith (CFCM), as well as Marseilles's mufti, criticized the UOIF for this irrelevant fatwa and opposed Nicolas Sarkozy's controversial use of Islamic organizations, declaring that their role was not to intercede for the youth. Henceforth, the leading authorities of French Islamic organizations refused any political deviation of Islam, which was to be maintained in the private sphere as a personal matter
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_Paris_suburb_riots
posted by Blogger at 9:27 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home